Reflections on the Role of Theory in Particle Physics

Theoretical research provides the conceptual framework that binds together all the areas of experimental particle physics and opens portals to other realms of science and mathematics. Theorists synthesize existing knowledge, identify gaps in our understanding, and imagine ways to advance the frontiers. They work to create a universal scientific language that encompasses the full panorama of experimental and observational campaigns, and they seek insights that develop into both explanatory and predictive power.

By expressing hypotheses and insights in mathematical form, theorists enable rigorous tests of ideas in new settings. Theory joins our knowledge and speculations about the very large—the Universe and its evolution over cosmological timescales—and the very small—the short distances and time intervals probed directly in collider experiments and indirectly in ultrasensitive experiments.

Theoretical research takes several overlapping forms, each rich and diverse. Exploratory (sometimes denoted fundamental) theory probes our understanding of the theoretical principles and mathematical structures that underlie our modern conception of nature. Within its purview are topics that do not yet have consequences that can be checked by experiment but already point to surprising connections among profound conceptual issues. Particle phenomenology engages closely with experiment and observation, by analyzing and interpreting their results and by proposing new studies. Phenomenologists elaborate the consequences of established or conjectured theories and seek to incorporate new findings by inventing models to explore “If this, then what?” Computational theory advances our science by developing new algorithms and by shaping or adapting novel computing architectures. Large-scale simulations and other machine-based techniques make explicit the implications of theory for experiment and illuminate the structure of theories to a degree impossible by other means.

In many university physics departments, theorists who work in particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology take the lead in introducing graduate students who contemplate many research topics to the methods and concepts of quantum field theory and to the worldview captured in the standard model of particle physics. Scientists in national laboratories and university departments mentor postdoctoral scholars from around the globe—future leaders in research and technology.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Brief Thoughts on Future Circular Colliders

The January/February 2019 issue of the CERN Courier introduces the Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Reports and offers commentary on the European and Chinese initiatives. Here is an extended version of my contribution to the commentary.

1. Why is a 100-km collider (regardless of where it is built) the right choice for the field now?

Let’s begin with two observations: (1) There is great interest in learning as much as we can about the Higgs boson and the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking. If a high-luminosity electron–positron Higgs factory were to drop out of the sky tomorrow, the line of users would be very long. (2) In contrast to the state of knowledge before the construction of the Large Hadron Collider (and the aborted Superconducting Super Collider), when the electroweak (TeV) scale was a clear landmark, we have not yet identified the next important energy scale.

A very large tunnel, say 100 km in circumference, would be a very fruitful investment for the field for many decades. It would enable a number of ambitious instruments, evolving with our technological capabilities and our scientific imperatives. A very-high-energy hadron collider is a vessel of discovery that would, for example, help us study the role of the Higgs boson in taming the high-energy behavior of longitudinal gauge-boson (WW) scattering. [For additional examples, see C. Quigg, “Dream Machines,” Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology 10, (2019), arXiv:1808.06036; I pose many more questions in “Perspectives and Questions,” doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1458236 (October 2018).]

2. Is the preference in the first instance for a lepton or for a hadron collider?

If we interpret 100 km circumference to mean 100 TeV c.m. energy for a proton–proton collider, then we have not yet mastered the magnet technology needed. On the other hand, a significant step from the LHC, say a quadrupling of energy, could be readily achieved within current practice. In contrast, what is needed for an electron–positron collider to reach top-pair threshold is essentially ready now. If the International Linear Collider were to go forward as a Higgs factory, we would have to consider carefully whether a circular electron machine, arguably with superior capabilities, should be our top priority.

3. Is it beneficial or detrimental to the field as a whole to have two competing proposals for a major collider at this time?

It is a very significant validation of the scientific promise opened by a 100-km ring for scientists of different regions to express the same judgment.

4. From a theorist’s point of view, how much does it matter if the post-LHC machine is built in Asia over Europe or vice versa?

CERN has earned an exemplary reputation for inclusiveness and openness, which go hand in hand with scientific excellence. Any region, nation, and institution that aims to host a world-leading instrument must strive for a similar environment.

5. And from the point of view of the long-term future of the field?

I look forward to a world in which every region helps to advance science, people of many origins and backgrounds bring their talents, and science and reason inform the lives of people everywhere.

Posted in Physics | Comments Off on Brief Thoughts on Future Circular Colliders

Time and Change

Communication to my Fermilab colleagues, Fall 2016


Dear Friends,

For more than forty-two years, Fermilab has been my perfect scientific home. The lab has provided a stimulating and supportive environment for my research and community service, trusted me to help build an enviable theoretical physics group, granted me an uncommon degree of independence, and given me the precious gift of a matchless collection of creative and congenial colleagues.

I now feel the need for more complete freedom to follow my scientific instincts and take advantage of new opportunities to contribute to particle physics worldwide. Accordingly, at the end of 2016, I will leave the Fermilab payroll and make the transition to emeritus status.

My specific plans are still taking shape, and will certainly evolve over time. In the short term, I will spend more time at CERN and other European institutions, while maintaining a regular presence at Fermilab. I thank you for inspiration and solidarity over the years, and look forward to many new adventures together.

With deep appreciation,

Chris

Posted in Physics | Comments Off on Time and Change

John David Jackson

John David Jackson, professor emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley, whose magisterial textbook Classical Electrodynamics has shaped graduate education for more than a half century, died on 20 May 2016 in Lansing, Michigan …

Read my JDJ obituary in the October 2016 issue of Physics Today.

Posted in Physics | Comments Off on John David Jackson